Northern Times, 11 May, 1912.
POINTED PARS
(By "Parted Points)
Arising out of the Koombana loss,
comes the suggested passing of a
"Light Load Line" Act. Such an
Act, designed to prevent vessels
putting to sea with empty holds and
at times over-weighted with deck
cargo, was thrown out by the House of
Lords in Britain several years ago.
The Plimsoll mark now prevents over
loading - it is argued, with some show
of reasonableness, that another mark
showing the highest safe elevation of
a modern passenger steamer above
water is badly needed. The Koombana
was admittedly light-laden ; she was
reputedly supposed to be top heavy,
particularly when in that trim. It would
be better that the times for the sailing
of boats should not only be altered to
suit the whims of shipping companies
and their directors but also in the event
of a reputable official being satisfied that
she was too light to tempt the frequent
storms of our coasts. His task would be
an easy one if each vessel was provided
with a 'light load line'. While that was
above water she was to be detained in
port regardless of cost to owners. The
results would be fewer accidents, which
would more than recompense us for
fewer vessels of the 'sky scraper' class.
And indeed in light of the Waratah,
Yongala and Koombana tragedies,
Australia would be wise to complete
what the British Houses of Commons
and Lords bungled between them.
Vessels built for speed on the shoaling
coasts should not be allowed to pander
to the passengers demanded a deck
cabin and promenade and other decks
above, regardless of stability in extreme
cases; unfortunately 'extreme cases' have
a habit occurring too frequently to make
the game worth the candle. What is
demanded is yet a little more 'interference
with private enterprise'. With regard to
the foregoing, Mr. Moss is hereby assured
it has not been written (vide our telegrams)
by somebody the Press object of 'up
scandalous rumours'. It is written solely
as a suggestion to if possible minimse
the possibility of the occurrence of too
many more of those 'mysteries unfortunately
periodically happening at sea.'
Another suggestion that should be seriously
considered by the Federal authorities to save
a few pounds, many lives are annually risked,
and I believe I am safe in saying, more than
half of them annually lost in the attempt to
navigate such vessels as dredgers, hoppers,
and other barges, intended for use only in
safe waters, across many thousands of
miles of ocean, as from New Zealand to
Australia. All hopes are given up for the
dredge Manchester and her crew hence
these remarks. The suggestion is that
regardless of cost, barges and dredges
for use in Australia should be built there,
and then at the nearest shipyard to
where they are to be worked. Failing
this, owners to be given the option of
having such vessels towed by sea-
going steamers. The crew of the dredge
would be given some fighting chance if
they were being towed, although in a
blow chance would be the very reverse of
rosy. This restriction would perhaps prevent
the importation of dredges other than in
sections aboard some better vessel; that
may be a disadvantage in the eyes of the
import-everything crowd. To my mind, the
saving of lives of citizens with sufficient
pluck to take the terrible risks entailed
by 'such an undertaking such a voyage
in such a vessel' would more than
recompense the Commonwealth for
the loss of a little of the capitalists' sinews
of war.
courtesy Trove.