Wednesday, 20 June 2018

DISGUSTED

The West Australian, 30 November, 1909

SHIPPING TELEGRAMS.

To the Editor.

Intelligence at the Perth G.P.O. leaves a
lot to be desired. Yesterday, for instance,
a number of persons interested in the move
ments of Nor'-West steamers were anxious
to ascertain the whereabouts of the Koombana 
and Minderoo, both known to be on
their way to Fremantle with an unusually
large number of passengers. The notice
board read:--Sharks Bay, November 27
Arrived: Koombana, from Carnarvon:
Koombana, from Sharks Bay. Then it was
notified from Sharks Bay that the Koombana 
had departed for Geraldton, also for
Fremantle. Nothing, however, was tele
graphed from Geraldton about the Koombana, 
and those desirous of meeting her at
Fremantle were in a quandary. Then the
board showed that the Koombana was sighted 
off Rottnest, but the intimation was
given too late to admit of Perth residents
being able to catch a Fremantle train soon
enough to meet the steamer on arrival. The
loose haphazard style of intimating that
a mail steamer arrived at Sharks Bay from
Sharks Bay on the same date naturally dis
counted the value of all the other notifications. 
As for the Minderoo travelling up and
down the coast, little or no information was
obtainable from the board, which ought
to be absolutely reliable and above all right
up to date.-Yours, etc.,
Fix this text
DISGUSTED

Nothing makes it clearer than this 'disgust' at the tardiness of the coastal service. Of course there was no insight into the immense challenges presented by tidal ports and weather conditions. No wonder Captain Allen was 'pressed on'.

courtesy Trove.

KOOMBANA NEAPED

Northern Times, 6 November, 1909.

The first tram to Point Sampson under the
new arrangement left on Tuesday, 20th
inst, to meet the Koombana, and was
availed of by a number, in addition to the
numerous passengers, and it is intended to
meet all steamers and also run as necessary
at other times till a regular time table is
required. The tramway service to Cossack
has been altered, and for the present a
day tram only will be run, leaving Roebourne 
at 10 a.m. The altered state of affairs will be 
much appreciated by the Roebourne public 
at all events, as now the despatch and 
receipt of mails will be greatly facilitated, 
and passengers will be able to remain 
at home till within a very few hours of the 
ship's arrival. Of course it will take some 
days to arrange matters, but Mr. Thomson 
is already showing himself ready to meet 
the wishes of the residents. Though the 
first tram left early in the morning yet a 
large number gathered to witness its 
departure, and later in the day, like the 
proverbial cat, "it came back" with a hungry 
and disappointed party, the cause being that
the Koombana had been neaped at Hedland. 
Word coming through later that the boat had 
left Hedland at about 6 p.m. the passengers 
left again for the boat, hoping for better luck.

The reality of Koombana being caught in Port Hedland by the tide. Inconvenience and a knock-on effect, potentially extending to other ports up and down the coast. One can understand the pressure Captain Allen experienced to 'press on'. The limited access to a tidal port such as Hedland was a central factor contributing to the disaster. It does raise a number of issues:

1. Did Koombana's size and draught qualify her for using this tidal port?

2. In order to clear the outer bar, Koombana had to empty her tanks which made her unstable in terms of GM - unseaworthy. 

3. Filling ballast tanks at sea was risky at best and frankly dangerous if Koombana was rolling and pitching, as was witnessed on the morning of 20 March.

4. 'Bumping' the outer bar on numerous occasions would surely have caused latent damage to the keel and hull of Koombana? It does remind one of the discovery of a 150 ft. section of her bilge keel near the coast after the disaster!!!

5. The harbour master at Port Hedland,who represented Captain Irvine, the Chief harbour master, sanctioned Koombana exiting his port on numerous occasions in extremely light, unseaworthy condition. The Department of Harbour and LIghts was thus, albeit indirectly, also responsible for allowing Koombana to go to her fate? 

6. Trying to save costs at the expense of lives and safety in terms of not dredging the bar and not providing lighters for ships the size of Koombana.

courtesy Trove.

Tuesday, 19 June 2018

DOOR DESCRIPTION

KOOMBANA WRECKAGE FOUND.
The Premier of West Australia has received the 
following message from the Resident Magistrate at Port
Hedland : —
'Captain Townley, of the Gorgon, reported on arriving 
here to-night, 25 miles north by west of Bedout Island,
we sighted a white panelled piece of wood. Stopped and
picked it up. The description is : Panelled door, painted
white, one side has been polished. The other fittings
were marked with crossed flags, and Walker and Hall in
brackets, and ornamented with a Grecian urn. The
door had apparently been forced off by pressure, as both
handles on the white side were gone, and on the reverse 
side had been driven in. 

What is interesting about the description is that the door was intact and showed evidence of having been forced out of the frame by a uniform force such as that exerted by a volume of water possibly when the steamer rolled over onto her port side.  This makes more sense than 'shredding' wind destruction in the middle of a cyclone.

We proceeded after stoppage,' and passed through several 
small pieces of wreck, one a painting stage. Others were 
apparently small pieces of board. An unusual number of 
birds were about.'

Birds do suggest that there were bodies adrift, not necessarily seen by the crew of the Gorgon.
On Tuesday last the Premier received' the following
telegram from the resident magistrate, Broome :— 
'Message just received from postmaster, Pt. Hedland, reads :
'Jones, of steamer Gorgon, just ashore. Found door
of stateroom 50 miles from here, north of Bedout Island,
where there is a lot of small wreckage. There appears
to be no doubt.'

Mr. Moxon, manager of the Adelaide Company at 
Fremantle, said in his opinion there was no doubt that the
flotsam comprised portions of the Kocmbana's fittings, the
description received from the company's manager at
Port Hedland clearing up any doubt in that regard. The
floating door was evidently from the chief steward's
cabin, leading off from the saloon entrance on the spar
deck, the leather-headed nails being used for the purpose 
of hanging nick-nacks upon. 


courtesy Trove.

Tuesday, 8 May 2018

IMPORTANT MAP

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/page/4351575

The assumption made in previous posts is that the track from Broome to Port Hedland was the same in reverse. Logic did not prevail. It would be unlikely and unsafe for steamers traversing in opposite directions to narrowly avoid collisions. With this in mind it was an interesting discovery to find a map of the route most likely intended by Captain Allen of the Koombana - see image below. But perhaps even more interesting, is the Google Earth image of this route overlying the position of the oil patch, suggesting that Koombana was very much on course when she foundered!! 



courtesy Trove.


Monday, 29 May 2017

STABILITY EXPLAINED.

Although there is a emphasis on the Waratah in this post, the point is clearly made regarding top heavy steamers.

The West Australian, 13 April, 1912.

STABILITY OF SHIPS AND
LAWS OF STORMS. 
- To the Editor.

"Sir, now I that the missing Koombana
may certainly be listed as lost, like the
Waratah and Yongala, the travelling public
might very well be interested in studying
for themselves the simple proposition of 
stability in ships. This proposition lies buried
in scientific jargon as far as the man in the
Street is concerned, and can easily be 
demonstrated in ordinary language. 

It is a long time since Archimedes proved. 
that a floating body is exactly the same 
weight as the water it displaces. A steamer, 
with whatever cargo or ballast she may 
have in her, is exactly the same weight as 
the water she displaces. The water she 
displaces is what would fill the cavity her 
weight and shape impose below the water 
line or surface of the water. Exactly in the 
centre of this cavity, in which the floating 
ship fits lies the vessel's centre of buoyancy, 
and through this centre there acts an upward 
pressure from the sea in its endeavour to 
become level against the weight of the ship. 

When a steamer is floating upright, this 
centre of buoyancy lies midships in a 
vertical line or plane, dividing the vessel 
in two. If one thinks of  a partition being 
built from stem to stern amidships from 
the keel upward, then in this partition lies 
the centre of buoyancy when the steamer 
stands upright, and it lies nearly half-way 
between the keel. and the water line. 

The water line is a imaginary line or plane 
joining, from side to side through the vessel 
the  surfaces of the surrounding sea. Not any
of the painted lines on the hull often alluded
to as the "water line." When a steamer
heels over; that is lists or rolls from side to
side part of her hull comes out above the
level of the sea on one side and another part
sinks further in on the other side. When
this happens the centre of buoyancy changes
position in the hull while always retaining
its position about the centre of whatever
portion of the hull is immersed. Thus, as
she rolls to starboard, it leaves the assumed
partition amidships, moving to starboard,
returning to partition, and then towards
port as she rolls from starboard, through
upright, and then to port.

As before explained, there is always an
upward pressure from the ocean in a 
straight line perpendicular to its level
surface through this moving centre of 
buoyancy and that line always passes 
through a given point in the midships 
partition above it. This point is termed 
the "meta centre" by experts and it will 
readily be imagined that the centre of 
buoyancy swings from side to side like 
a pendulum suspended from it, when
the vessel is rolling at sea.

There is now the centre of gravity, which
everyone nowadays understands is simply
the centre of weight to be considered as it
must readily be realised that a vessel's
centre of gravity depends upon the amount 
of cargo or ballast she may be carrying and
how such is stowed or disposed in her holds.
But once the cargo or ballast is placed, stowed,
or, disposed in the vessel, the centre of 
gravity remains constant, and does not
shift (unless the cargo shifts), like the centre
of buoyancy. If the vessel be stowed properly 
it will be found somewhere in the assumed 
midships partition and at a point below meta 
centre point. The pressure from the weight of 
the ship is always in the direction of an assumed 
plumb line hanging from the centre of gravity point, 
and as the vessel rolls at sea this plumb line or 
direction of pressure swings from side to side
in harmony with the line of buoyancy, exactly 
coinciding when the vessel is upright, and parallel, 
with an increasing distance between them as the 
vessel rolls to one side. 

The degree of stability- that is safety from capsizing 
- depends on the distance of the meta centre above 
the centre of gravity. This distance is termed the meta 
centric height. (GM). The force downward from the
centre of gravity is exactly equal to the force 
upward exerted by the ocean endeavouring to 
get level; and these two forces tend to right the ship 
when the undulations of the sea swing her away
from the upright. The greater the metacentric 
height which is the same as saying the greater 
the safety from capsizing, the more uncomfortable 
the vessel to travel on. (not so - greater GM equates
with brisker, less comfortable rolling) The more 
leverage the forces of buoyancy and gravity have 
the more quickly they can right the vessel swaying 
on the undulating surface. Too great safety from 
capsizing brings about other dangers. Sailing vessels
with heavy dead-weight cargoes have been
known to lose their masts and strain their
hulls to such an extent, in so rolling, their
masts out, that they have sprung a leak and
foundered. 


Iron and such like heavy cargoes have often to 
be stowed in narrow trunkways or on platforms
especially built in the ship to keep her centre
of gravity higher when loaded. When we hear
people say that such and such a vessel is a 
grand seaboat, etc., etc., such a vessel may 
have been very unsafe on that particular voyage, 
her very unsafety contributing to the comfortable 
travelling. 


It may be taken for granted there is very little
difference in modern cargo vessels when
carrying complete cargoes that nearly fill
them. With like loading they may safely
be expected to behave much the same in
similar storms. The common design for such
vessels provides a breadth equal to about
twice the moulded depth below the main
deck,and as there are no passengers
carried there is very little superstructure
above the main deck. When we consider
passenger steamers, however, the tendency
to build additional decks and keep the 
passengers' accommodation all above the main
deck is most noticeable. Everyone prefers a
nice airy cabin to the stuffy ones which were
once the vogue, and all below the main deck.
Here it is an open question whether we are 
not sacrificing safety for comfort and carrying 
capacity. 

The fact that we have had the Waratah,
Yongala, and Koombana mysteries in these 
latitudes during the last three years is sufficient 
excuse for the public requiring some practical
and expert investigation made on their behalf. 
In the case of the Waratah it seems abundantly 
clear, from the evidence given at the Law Courts 
that this vessel was not considered to have 
sufficient ballasting powers when sailing without 
cargo, to counteract the weight of superstructure
supplying the passenger accommodation. She
was to some extent in the same predicament as 
our famous sailing clippers of last century, which 
needed nearly half a cargo of ballast to go seeking 
for cargoes from one port to another. 

When the Waratah was lost she had nearly a 
full cargo on board and whatever her degree 
of stability was when empty, had surely nothing 
to do with her degree of stability when loaded. 
Yet, as far as  the writer can learn, there was 
little or no evidence forthcoming as to the weight 
and disposal of the cargo she lad when lost.

In the case of the Koombana there is
considerable food for reflection. She was
probably carrying less than 500 tons of
cargo and:appears to have been engulfed
in the centre of a "willy-willy." It the opinion 
of the writer that the Koombana in light trim 
was not fit to encounter a hurricane centre.
The writer has been caught near a cyclone 
centre off Mauritius in a sailing vessel, and 
remembering how that vessel, although in 
ideal load and trim was.smothered under 
almost bare poles with bulwarks under water 
and hatch comings awash, he cannot conceive 
it possible for a steamer like the Koombana 
in light trim, exposing such an area of 
superstructure to such a force of wind, to live 
through it.

The question is, 'Is it a legitimate risk to send
such a vessel in such a trim into hurricane
latitudes in hurricane seasons?" 

It must be remembered that the law of
storms is getting on towards being an exact
science, with barometers to provide indications
of approach; and with means to indicate the 
vessel's position from the centre and to show 
from collected data the most probable path of 
the centre, a good steamer with an experienced 
and expert master should easily avoid being 
caught. It is a matter of vigilance and judgment
just as is the case with a pedestrian avoiding
motor cars. These remarks are applicable.
to cyclones, typhoons, and other well
known and studied storms, but have we
done our duty with regard.to the Nor'-West
"willy-willy" ?? Is there a published hand
book with information; instructions; and
suggestions as is the case in other 
hurricane parts of the,world for the
safety of mariners. If not, is it not a work 
worth taking in hand at once?

'Yours; etc.,
LONGSHOREMAN.'

Fremantle, April.



SS Waratah 


SS Koombana (courtesy wikipedia)
courtesy Trove